Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20203:18-cv-00840California6,983 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE: OUTLAW LABORATORIES, LP Case No.: 18CV840 GPC (BGS)

LITIGATION,

ORDER ON JOINT STATEMENT

. REGARDING FOUR OUTLAW

DOCUMENTS

15 [ECF 214] 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Outlaw Laboratories, LP (“Outlaw”) and Counter-claimant Roma Mikha and Third-Party Plaintiff NMRM, Inc. and Skyline Market, Inc. (collectively the “Stores”) filed a Joint Statement on May 29, 2020 regarding four documents Outlaw claims are protected from disclosure by attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. (ECF 214.) The Joint Statement follows the parties’ submission of a joint letter brief to the Court with the four documents attached for in camera review. Outlaw claims the documents are privileged and should not be disclosed. The Stores argue the documents are not subject to attorney client privilege or the work product doctrine and argues even if they are, they are subject to the crime-fraud exception. The parties’ Joint Statement indicates “[t]he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.