Valdez
Valdez v. Doe 1
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20203:20-cv-00737California1,433 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RICARDO VALDEZ, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0737-WQH-RBM
CDCR #E-98488,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)
AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION
DOE #1, Officer; WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FAILURE TO PREPAY FILING
CORRECTIONS AND
FEES REQUIRED BY
REHABILITATION,
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) Defendants. 17 [ECF No. 2] 18 Plaintiff Ricardo Valdez, while incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se,1 filed a Complaint
22 The Court notes that another RJD prisoner, Raul Arellano, has submitted Valdez’s Complaint and seeks the appointment of counsel on Ricardo Valdez’s behalf. (See Compl. at 5.) While Valdez may appear on his own behalf, Arellano may not represent him in this case. See Johns v. Cty. of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 24 877 (9th Cir.…