Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 In re Outlaw Laboratory, LLP. Case No.: 3:18-CV-0840-GPC
ORDER
13 (1) GRANTING THE STORES’
MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE
MAY 29, 2020 ORDER AS TO
PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM OF “UNFAIR”
BUSINESS PRACTICES, AND
17 (2) DISMISSING THE “UNFAIR”
BUSINESS PRACTICES CLAIM
WITH PREJUDICE.
20 (ECF NO. 213.) 21 On May 29, 2020, the Court largely granted the Stores’ motion for judgement on the pleadings as to Plaintiff Outlaw Laboratory, LLP’s Complaint. (ECF No. 209.) The Court found that Plaintiff failed to state a claim under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq., California’s False Advertising Law (“FAL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500, and the “fraudulent” and “unlawful” prongs of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200. Importantly, however, the Court observed that the Stores did not challenge the adequacy of the Outlaw’s claim for “unfair” business practices under the UCL. (ECF No. 209 at…