Porter

Porter v. Employment Development Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20203:20-cv-01164California1,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN M. PORTER Case No.: 20cv1164-LAB (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS;

EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT

ORDER OF DISMISSAL Defendant. WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF

TO AMEND

19 Plaintiff Brian Porter filed his complaint in this case along with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Docket no. 2.) While his IFP motion is not complete, it is apparent Porter lacks the funds to pay the filing fee, and his motion is GRANTED. The Court is required to screen the complaint of any plaintiff proceeding IFP, and to dismiss it to the extent it fails to state a claim or is frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Dismissal for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2) incorporates the standard for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.