Wilson

Wilson v. Segovia

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20203:19-cv-02254California412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILSON, Case No.: 19-cv-2254-LAB-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ EX

PARTE APPLICATION TO

SEGOVIA, et al.,

MODIFY THE SCHEDULING

Defendants. ORDER

16 [ECF No. 12] 17 18 On June 26, 2020, Defendants moved ex parte to modify the scheduling order regulating discovery and other pre-trial proceedings. (ECF No. 12). On March 11, 2020, the court filed a scheduling order setting deadlines for discovery and pre-trial proceedings. (ECF No. 9). On May 15, 2020, the Court granted defendants’ ex parte application to take the Deposition of Plaintiff. (ECF No. 11). Defendants now request to extend the scheduling order deadlines by sixty days, to September 2020. (ECF No. 12 at 3). In support, Defendants 1 || Rehabilitation (““CDRC”) describing their request to continue all “hearings, 9 || depositions, confidential calls, and in-person meetings through the end of 3 ||…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.