Dorsey

Dorsey v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20203:20-cv-00843California656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSIE DORSEY, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00843-JAH-LL

CDCR #AF-6022,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY

FILING FEE REQUIRED

BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR

D. PARAMO, et al.,

FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED

Defendants. IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

21 Plaintiff Jessie Dorsey, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan 22 Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 23 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF No. 1, Compl.)

I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status

25 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 26 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 27 28 $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.