Mullen Technologies, Inc. v. Qiantu Motor (Suzhou) Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20203:19-cv-01979California2,442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MULLEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Case No.: 3:19-CV-1979 W (AHG) California corporation,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION AND STAY THIS

QIANTU MOTOR (SUZHOU) LTD.,

ACTION PENDING CONCLUSION OF a limited liability company,

THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDING

16 Defendant. [DOC. 5]; AND (2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS [DOC. 13]

19 Pending before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendant Qiantu Motor (Suzhou) LTD (“Qiantu”). Qiantu has also filed a motion for sanctions. Plaintiff Mullen Technologies, Inc. (“Mullen”) opposes both motions. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Qiantu’s motion to compel arbitration [Doc. 5.], STAYS this action pending the conclusion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.