Mullen Technologies, Inc. v. Qiantu Motor (Suzhou) Ltd.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MULLEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Case No.: 3:19-CV-1979 W (AHG) California corporation,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION AND STAY THIS
QIANTU MOTOR (SUZHOU) LTD.,
ACTION PENDING CONCLUSION OF a limited liability company,
THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDING
16 Defendant. [DOC. 5]; AND (2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS [DOC. 13]
19 Pending before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendant Qiantu Motor (Suzhou) LTD (“Qiantu”). Qiantu has also filed a motion for sanctions. Plaintiff Mullen Technologies, Inc. (“Mullen”) opposes both motions. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Qiantu’s motion to compel arbitration [Doc. 5.], STAYS this action pending the conclusion…