Pekrins

Pekrins v. Angulo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20203:18-cv-00850California3,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY RONNELL PERKINS, Case No.: 18cv850-DMS-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

C. ANGULO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 44] 16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel [ECF No. 44] and Defendants’ Response [ECF No. 53]. Plaintiff requests that the Court compel Defendants to serve further responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production (“RFPs”) Nos. 3-8, 10-14. ECF No. 44 at 5-6. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On June 8, 2020, Plaintiff, Gary Ronnell Perkins, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed 24 the instant Motion to Compel further responses to Plaintiff’s RFPs Nos. 3-8, 10-14.1 ECF No. 44. On June 8, 2020, after reviewing Plaintiff’s Motion, the Court found it appropriate to direct the Parties to meet and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.