Klaehn

Klaehn v. Cali Bamboo LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20203:19-cv-01498California6,763 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 WILLIAM KLAEHN, et al., CASE NO. 19cv1498-LAB (KSC) Plaintiffs, vs. O DER FD EE NR D G AR NA TN ’ST MIN OG T I IN O NP A TR OT D ISMISS CALI BAMBOO, LLC, et al., Defendants. [Dkt. No. 15]

This is a putative consumer class action challenging Cali Bamboo, LLC’s (“Cali”) marketing of bamboo flooring. Cali filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint. Dkt. No. 15. The Court GRANTS that motion IN PART. BACKGROUND The Court accepts all well-pleaded allegations in the complaint as true for the purposes of the motion to dismiss. South Ferry LP, No. 2 v. Killinger, 542 F.3d 776, 782 (9th Cir. 2008). These factual allegations are taken from the First Amended Class Action Complaint. Dkt. No. 14 (“FAC”). A. Cali’s Business and Marketing Representations Cali develops and manufactures bamboo flooring for installation in homes and other structures (id. at ¶ 1), which it distributes, markets, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.