Yablonsky

Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20203:18-cv-01122California753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 John Henry YABLONSKY Case No.: 18cv1122-CAB-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. No. 39]; and (2) GRANTING IN PART CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

AND DENYING IN PART MOTION

CORRECTION AND

TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 33]

REHABILITATION,

16 Defendants.

18 On October 7, 2019, Defendants D. Powell, G. Martinez, J. Robles, D. McGuire, 19 R. Blahnik, and C. Tiscarnia (“Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First 20 Amended Complaint. [Doc. No. 39.] On November 5, 2019, Plaintiff John Henry 21 Yablonsky (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. [Doc. No. 35.] On December 13, 2019, 22 Defendants filed a reply. [Doc. No. 36.] On December 31, 2019, Plaintiff filed a sur- 23 reply. [Doc. No. 38.] On June 2, 2020, Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler prepared a 24 Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that the motion to dismiss be 25 granted in part and denied in part. [Doc. No. 39.]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.