Handheld Group AB v. Agile Systems, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20203:20-cv-01274California749 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 HANDHELD GROUP AB, Case No. 20-cv-01274-BAS-DEB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT v. STIPULATION AND ENTERING

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

AGILE SYSTEMS, INC.,

[ECF No. 6] 14 Defendant. 15 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Stipulation and Request for Order Entering Injunction. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff Handheld Group AB (“Handheld”) and Defendant Agile Systems, Inc. (“Agile”) have stipulated to allow the entry and enforcement of a preliminary injunction to safeguard any Handheld property in Agile’s possession. (Id. ¶ 2.) A stipulated preliminary injunction “is essentially a proposed injunction that reflects a temporary settlement.” Fed. Trade Comm’n v. Enforma Nat. Prod., Inc., 362 F.3d 1204, 1218 (9th Cir. 2004) (finding a stipulated preliminary injunction analogous to a consent decree, which “is no more than a settlement that contains an injunction”). As such, a court “is empowered to enter and enforce stipulated 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.