Baker

Baker v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20203:19-cv-00925California2,185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

22 The underlying action involves Plaintiff’s challenge to the denial of her application 23 for social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. On May 16, 2019, 24 Plaintiff filed a complaint against the acting Commissioner of Social Security. ECF No. 1. Defendant filed the administrative record in lieu of an answer. ECF No. 15. The Court set a scheduling order, requiring formal settlement discussions and a joint status report, as well as that a Joint Motion for Judicial Review of Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Motion for Judicial Review, the parties filed a joint motion for voluntary remand pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which sought a remand and entry of judgment in favor of Plaintiff. ECF No. 23. On March 27, 2020, the Court granted the joint motion, 4 remanded the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administration action, 5 and entered a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, reversing the final 6 decision of the Commissioner. ECF No. 24. A Clerk’s Judgment was entered on 7 March 27, 2020. ECF No. 25. The instant motion follows. Here,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.