Macias
Macias v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL M., Case No.: 3:20-cv-1021-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
v.
PAUPERIS
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, [ECF No. 11] 15 Defendant.
17 On June 3, 2020, Plaintiff Daniel M. (“Plaintiff”) brought this action against the 18 Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew Saul, seeking judicial review of the 19 Commissioner’s final administrative decision denying his application for Social Security 20 Supplemental Security Income Disability Benefits for lack of disability. ECF No. 1. Along 21 with his Complaint, Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 22 (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the 23 Court sua sponte screened Plaintiff’s complaint to evaluate whether his complaint 24 sufficiently stated a claim upon which relief may be granted, and dismissed Plaintiff’s 25 complaint without prejudice as boilerplate and conclusory. ECF No. 7…