Hicks
Hicks v. Diaz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HICKS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00217-CAB-BLM CDCR No. B-80852,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
RALPH DIAZ, et al., [Doc. No. 7]; Defendants. 16 (2) GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [Doc. No. 2]; and
(3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
20 § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b) 21 On February 3, 2020, Michael Hicks (“Plaintiff”) currently incarcerated at R.J. Donovan State Prison (“RJD”), filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), finding that Plaintiff had “three strikes” because “on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the 28 …