Politte

Politte v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20203:19-cv-01506California9,972 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 DAVID P., Case No.: 3:19-cv-01506-BEN-AHG Plaintiff, REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION REGARDING

CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

ANDREW SAUL, JUDGMENT

Commissioner of Social Security, [ECF Nos. 22, 24] Defendant. This matter comes before the Court for a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 22, 24) regarding Plaintiff’s appeal of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. Plaintiff brings his appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). After a thorough review of the parties’ submissions, the administrative record, and applicable law, the undersigned recommends that the Court DENY Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22), GRANT Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24), and AFFIRM the Commissioner’s denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.