Winet

Winet v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20203:20-cv-00014California2,253 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 RICHARD WINET, an individual, Case No.: 3:20-CV-00014 W (BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT [DOC. 14]

ARTHUR GALLAGHER & CO.; and DOES 1-50, Inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 15(a)(2). [Doc. 14.] Defendant Arthur Gallagher & Co. (“Defendant”) opposes. The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion [Doc. 14]. // // // I. BACKGROUND On November 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed his initial complaint in California state court alleging breach of contract and various workplace harassment, discrimination, and tort claims relating to the alleged breach. (Notice of Removal [Doc. 1-4] Ex. A.) On January 2, 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.