Bonilla

Bonilla v. The Void Judgment of Alameda County, Case No. H-12210-A

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20203:20-cv-00881California1,607 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00881-DMS-JLB

CDCR #J-48500,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

THE VOID JUDGMENT OF ALAMEDA

[ECF No. 3] COUNTY, CASE NO. H-12210-A,

Defendant. AND

18 2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING

FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. §

20 1914(a)

22 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at San 23 Quentin State Prison has filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF 24 No. 1, Compl.; see also ECF No. 5, at 2, 5.) 25 On May 27, 2020, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to pay the 26 filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) and/or to file a motion to proceed in forma 27 pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a), and granted Plaintiff thirty days 28 leave in which to pay the filing fee or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.