Banuelos

Banuelos v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20203:19-cv-00785California5,987 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BEATRIZ B., Case No.: 3:19-cv-00785-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER RESOLVING JOINT

MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of [ECF No. 17] Social Security,1 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Beatriz B. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on April 29, 2019, seeking review 18 of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for 19 social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. ECF No. 1. The 20 parties consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge on May 7, 2019. ECF No. 5. 21 Pursuant to the Court’s Order, the parties filed a Joint Motion for Judicial Review on 22 December 9, 2019, stating their positions on the disputed issues in the case. ECF No. 17. 23 The Court has taken the Joint Motion under submission without oral argument. 24 25 26 1 Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of Social Security on June 17, 2019. Although Plaintiff originally brought this action against Former Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.