IPCOMM, LLC. v. Group Rossignol USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20203:20-cv-00272California2,075 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 IPCOMM, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-272-BAS-RBB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

v. [ECF No. 8]

GROUP ROSSIGNOL USA, INC. et al., 15 Defendants. 16

Plaintiff IPCOMM, LLC filed a complaint for patent infringement. Defendants Group Rossignol USA, Inc. and PIQ USA Inc. move to dismiss the complaint. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to the Motion, (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 9) to which Defendants replied (“Reply,” ECF No. 10). The Court finds resolution of this matter is suitable without the need for oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 8,612,181 (the ‘181 patent), entitled “Wireless System for Monitoring and Analysis of Skiing.” (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1, a ski monitoring system called the PIQ ROBOT. (Id. ¶¶ 11, 12.) “[T]he PIQ ROBOT is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.