Pinuelas

Pinuelas v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20203:20-cv-00734California1,925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 Case No.: 20CV734-MMA(BLM) CHRISTINA PINUELAS,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

v. DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT

PREPAYING OF FEES OR COSTS

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

[ECF NO. 2] Defendant.

12 The instant matter was initiated on April 16, 2020 when Plaintiff filed a complaint to seek review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny Plaintiff’s “application for Title II Social Security Disability Insurance benefits and Title XVI Supplemental Security Income benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. §1383(c)(3).” ECF No. 1 at 1. That same day, Plaintiff filed a Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. ECF No. at 2. Having reviewed the complaint and motion, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) finds that Plaintiff’s complaint is sufficient to survive sua sponte screening. Application to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.