Biag
Biag v. King George - J&J Worldwide Services LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 ARTURO S. BIAG, in a Case No. 20-cv-307-BAS-DEB representative capacity only and on behalf of other members of the public ORDER GRANTING similarly situated, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
REMAND
Plaintiff, [ECF No. 8] v.
KING GEORGE – J&J WORLDWIDE SERVICES LLC; and DOES 1-10,
Defendant.
19 In February 2019, Plaintiff Arturo Biag filed a Complaint against Defendant King George – J&J Worldwide Services, LLC in California state court. (ECF No. 1- 3 (“Compl.”).) The original Complaint alleged violations pursuant only to California Labor Code § 2698 et seq., more commonly known as the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”). (Id.) On April 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint, alleging similar violations under the same law. (ECF No. 1-5, First. Am. Compl. (“FAC”).) On January 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint consisting of five claims that alleged class…