Cavalier

Cavalier v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20203:20-cv-01398California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT THOMAS CAVALIER, Case No.: 20-cv-01398-MMA-KSC

CDCR #E-98747,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § v. 1915A(b)(1);

GAVIN NEWSOM; JOHN DOE, Director DENYING MOTIONS TO PROCEED of BPH Operations; RANDY GROUNDS;

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT

RALPH DIAZ, [Doc. No. 2] Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Robert Thomas Cavalier, currently housed at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl. at 1, Doc. No. 1. In addition, Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Doc. No. 2. I. Sua Sponte Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, obligates the Court to review complaints filed by anyone “incarcerated or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.