Gaytan
Gaytan v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HUGO GAYTAN, Case No.: 20cv153-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. AMENDED MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner [ECF NO. 7] of Social Security, 15 Defendant.
17 On January 23, 2020, Plaintiff Hugo Gaytan filed this social security 18 appeal pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 19 §405(g), challenging the denial of his application for disability benefits. (ECF 20 No. 1). Plaintiff simultaneously filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis 21 (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2). The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP 22 because his application did not fully explain how he covered his living 23 expenses. (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff has filed an amended motion to proceed 24 IFP. (ECF No. 7). For the reasons set for below, the Court GRANTS 25 Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP. 26 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district ||court of the United States, except an…