Grano

Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20203:18-cv-01818California3,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 18cv1818-GPC(BLM) VINCENT GRANO,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

v. ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND

SODEXO MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.,

SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendants. [ECF No. 158] 16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ July 1, 2020 Motion for Reconsideration [ECF No 158 (“Mot.”)], Defendant US Foods, Inc.’s July 10, 2020 Opposition [ECF No. 164 (“US Oppo.”)], Defendant Sodexo Management Inc.’s July 10, 2020 Opposition [ECF No. 165 (“Sodexo Oppo.”)], Defendant Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.’s July 10, 2020 Opposition [ECF No. 166 (“Cargill Oppo.”)], and Plaintiffs’ July 14, 2020 Reply [ECF No. 167 (“Reply”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND On June 26, 2020, Third Party Defendant US Foods, Inc. filed a Motion to Amend Scheduling Order seeking to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.