Qualcomm Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Case No.: 3:17-cv-00121-BEN-MSB
SECURITIES LITIGATION
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
RECONSIDER
14 [Doc. No. 167] 15 16 Before the Court is Defendants Qualcomm Incorporated, Derek A. Aberle, Steven R. Altman, William F. Davidson, Paul E. Jacobs, Steven M. Mollenkopf, and Donald J. Rosenberg’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion to reconsider denial of lead Plaintiffs’ motion to seal (Doc. No. 165). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs the reconsideration of final orders of the district court. The Rule permits a district court to relieve a party from a final order or judgment on grounds of: “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud … of an adverse party, … or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgement.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). The motion for reconsideration must be made within a reasonable time, in any event “not more than one year after the judgment, order,…