Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Bosa Development California II, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20203:19-cv-01847California1,236 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE Case No.: 3:19-cv-01847-AJB-BGS

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE v.

COMPANY’S MOTION TO STAY

14 BOSA DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA (Doc. No. 24) II,

INC.; INSURANCE COMPANY OF

THE

STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendants. 18 Presently before the Court is Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company’s (“Liberty”) motion to stay. (Doc. No. 24.) Bosa Development California II, Inc. (“Bosa”) and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICOSP”) both filed non-oppositions. (Doc. Nos. 25, 28.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of several defects found in a condominium construction project. Bosa was the developer of this Legend condominium project (“the Legend Project”). Before Bosa began construction on the Legend Project, Bosa purchased a “wrap-up” insurance policy issued by Liberty for all contractors and subcontractors involved in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.