Appel

Appel v. Boston National Title Agency, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20203:18-cv-00873California1,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD APPEL, et al., Case No.: 3:18-cv-873-BAS-AHG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART JOINT MOTION

FOR ADDITIONAL AND LIMITED

BOSTON NATIONAL TITLE

WRITTEN DISCOVERY

AGENCY, LLC,

15 Defendant. [ECF No. 113]

21 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion and Stipulation for Additional and 22 Limited Written Discovery. ECF No. 113. The parties each request to propound 25 23 additional interrogatories, 25 additional requests for admission, and 25 additional requests 24 for production. Id. 25 A party may serve on any other party no more than 25 written interrogatories and 25 26 requests for admission. Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(1); CivLR 36.1(a). However, “parties may 27 stipulate that . . . other procedures governing or limiting discovery be modified.” FED. R. 28 CIV. P. 29(b). Rule 29 was revised “to give greater opportunity for litigants to agree upon modifications to the procedures governing discovery or to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.