Padilla
Padilla v. Arredondo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON PADILLA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0828-WQH-RBM
CDCR #K-33879,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
Plaintiff, RECONSIDERATION vs. 14 [ECF No. 9]
L. ARREDONDO; P. COVELLO;
S.K. HEMENWAY,
Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 I. Procedural History On April 30, 2020, Ramon Padilla (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1). 27 28 Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). On May 21, 2020, the Court GRANTED Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP but DISMISSED his Complaint for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). (ECF No. 4.) …