Hill
Hill v. Alpine Sherriff Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PERCY EDWIN HILL, Case No.: 18cv2470-CAB-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
vs. PREJUDICE MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [Doc. 14 No. 49] ALPINE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On March 5, 2018, Plaintiff Percy Edwin Hill (Plaintiff) filed a complaint against Defendants in state court regarding an alleged incident that occurred on November 23, 2017 at a property managed by Plaintiff. [Doc. No. 1-2.] Plaintiff claims, among other things, that the Defendant officers unlawfully assaulted him. [Id.] When Plaintiff filed the complaint, he was a non-prisoner proceeding pro se. The case was later removed to this Court. Continuing in his pro se status, on January 30, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) [Doc. No. 8], which the Defendants answered on February 14, 2019 [Doc. No. 10]. Thereafter the parties participated in an Early Neutral 1 …