Musgjerd

Savills Inc. v. Musgjerd

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20203:20-cv-00904California2,968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAVILLS INC., Case No. 20-cv-904-MMA (BLM)

Petitioner,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. RESPONDENT MUSGJERD’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2)

CHRISTOPHER MUSGJERD, and

DECLINING TO RULE ON

ROBERT MCGRIFF,

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO Respondents. COMPEL ARBITRATION

[Doc. Nos. 4, 20] 18 On May 14, 2020, Savills Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for an order compelling arbitration and injunctive relief enjoining Respondent Christopher Musgjerd (“Musgjerd”) “from proceeding in state court action pending in San Diego County Superior Court.” See Doc. No. 1. Petitioner subsequently filed a motion “to compel arbitration of dispute under 9 U.S.C. § 4 and to enjoin prosecution of improperly filed state court action.” See Doc. No. 4. Respondent Robert McGriff (“McGriff”) filed a notice of nonopposition to Petitioner’s Petition and motion. See Doc. Nos. 5, 7. 26 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.