Cooper

Cooper v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20203:20-cv-01342California5,785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SYDNEY COOOPER; aka Case No.: 3:20-cv01342-AJB-NLS

SIDNEY COOPER,

CDCR #H-58566, ORDER:

13 Plaintiff, 1) GRANTING MOTION TO 14 vs. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2]

DANIEL PARAMO; MARCUS 2) GRANTING MOTION TO

POLLARD; D. McGUIRE; T. EXCEED PAGE LIMITS [ECF No. 3];

GIURBINO; T.T. DELGADO;

CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF AND

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, 3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

20 Defendants. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

23 Sydney Cooper, also known as Sidney Cooper, (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated 24 at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California 25 and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 26 (See Compl., ECF No. 1). 27 / / / 28 Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.