MRSI Systems, LLC v. Palomar Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20203:19-cv-02344California2,283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

fare Beas Ned ng JUL 2-3 2020

4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 || MRSI SYSTEMS, LLC, . Case No.: 3:19-cv-02344-BEN-JLB : _ Plants) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 || v. DISMISS |} PALOMAR TECHNOLOGIES; INC., [ECF No. 20] Defendant. 16 Plaintiff MRSI Systems, LLC (“MRSI”), alleges Defendant Palomar Technologies, 18 || Inc. (“Palomar”), directly and indirectly infringes on four patents it holds in the field of 19 || die-bonding systems. Compl., ECF No. 1, J 1-2, 32, 48, 59, 69. Palomar moves to 20 || dismiss the Complaint for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted 21 || pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Mot., ECF No. 20-1. MRSI 22 || opposes the motion. Opp’n., ECF No. 24. For the reasons set forth below, the Court || DENIES the motion to dismiss. 24 25 /// 27 || //

BACKGROUND! MRSI is a manufacturer of automated,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.