Sekerke

Sekerke v. Leo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20203:19-cv-00034California4,437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE, Case No.: 3:19-cv-0034-GPC-RBB Booking No. 18165284,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR vs. RECONSIDERATION

[ECF No. 85]

ARTURO LEON; MARK O’BRIEN;

JON MONTGOMERY; DANE OLSEN

and COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendants. 19 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s prior order denying Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction. ECF No. 85 (“TRO Motion”). Defendant Arturo Leon filed an opposition on July 8, 2020. ECF No. 89. Defendants Jon Montgomery and Dane Olsen filed an opposition on July 10, 2020. ECF No. 96. Plaintiff filed replies to both oppositions. ECF Nos. 100, 101. The Court 25 26 1 Defendant County of San Diego filed an opposition joining in part Montgomery and Olsen’s Opposition on Sections I through IV but does not join the opposition regarding service of the Summons 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.