McCurley
McCurley v. Royal Seas Cruises, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN MCCURLEY, DAN Case No. 17-cv-00986-BAS-AGS DEFOREST, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiff, FIRST AMENDED MOTION TO STRIKE WITNESS DECLARATIONS, v.
FOR RESTRAINING ORDER, FOR
MONETARY SANCTIONS, AND FOR
ROYAL SEA CRUISES, INC,
DISQUALIFICATION OF COUNSEL
15 Defendant. [ECF No. 129] 16 On March 4, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Motion to Strike Witness Declarations, for Restraining Order, for Monetary Sanctions, and for Disqualification of Counsel (“Motion”). (ECF No. 129.) Defendant opposed the Motion on April 6, 2020 and Plaintiffs replied on April 13, 2020. (Opp’n, ECF No. 168; Reply, ECF No. 169.) After hearing oral argument on the Motion (ECF No. 189), and for the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ Motion. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS …