Musgrove

Musgrove v. Hanifin

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20203:20-cv-00614California1,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRVIN MUSGROVE, Case No.: 20-cv-00614-GPC-BLM

12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

ANGIE HANIFIN, SUSANA SOTO, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

AND OCEANSIDE HOUSING AND

AUTHORITY,

(2) DISMISSING THE THIRD Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

19 [ECF No. 2] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 31, 2020, Plaintiff Irvin Musgrove, proceeding pro se, initiated this action. ECF No. 1. On the same day, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. Plaintiff sent Defendant Keysa Machado, identified as Supervisor of Oceanside Housing Authority, a request for waiver of service of summons. ECF No. 1 at 6. On May 19, 2020, Petitioner filed a First Amended Complaint naming Angie Hanifin, Susana Soto, and Oceanside Housing Authority as Defendants. ECF No. 7. On May 20, 2020, Petitioner filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.