Stroud

Stroud v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20203:18-cv-00515-JLS-MDDCalifornia7,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLARD RICHARD STROUD, JR., Case No.: 18-CV-515 JLS (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED

SERGEANT JESUS LIZARRAGA,

COMPLAINT

BENJAMIN SHEA, SERGEANT PAUL

MICHALKE, and DOES 1–25, (ECF No. 64) Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 64), as well as Plaintiff’s Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 67) and Defendants’ Reply in Support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 69) the Motion. The Court vacated the hearing on the Motion and took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 70. After considering Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC,” ECF No. 63), the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.