Weeces

Weeces v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20203:20-cv-01439California386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK W, Case No.: 20cv1439-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS [DOC. NO. 5.]

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of

Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 On July 27, 2020, plaintiff Frank W. commenced an action against Andrew M. Saul, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, seeking review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner. [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiff also filed an Application to Proceed with the Complaint in forma pauperis. [Doc. No. 2.] On August 4, 2020, plaintiff filed an Amended Application to Proceed in forma pauperis. [Doc. No. 5.] A court may authorize the commencement of a suit without prepayment of fees if the plaintiff submits an affidavit, including a statement of all his or her assets, showing that he or she is unable to pay the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The affidavit must “state the facts as to [the] affiant's poverty with some…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.