Tilei
Tilei v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20203:19-cv-01708California2,535 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PUNAOFO TSQUITO TILEI, CDCR #H- Case No.: 3:19-cv-01708-WQH-KSC 96960,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
Plaintiff, NEW DETERMINATION v. APPOINTING COUNSEL; ORDER
ON REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF
NOTICE [Doc. Nos. 50, 54]
CORRECTION AND
REHABILITATION; DR. DAVID
CLAYTON; DR. PEYMAN SHAKIBA;
DR. SAHA; JASHUA N. DOROS; DOES
1-10, Defendant. 20 Plaintiff Punaofo Tsquito Tilei (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Title 42, United State Code, Section 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights under the United States Constitution. See Doc. No. 1. Before the Court are plaintiff’s Motion for a New Determination Appointing Counsel Due to “Exceptional Circumstances” (the “Motion”) and a Request for Judicial Notice of Court Records in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for a New Determination…