Neill
Neill v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM JOSEPH NEILL, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01288-AJB-MSB Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v.
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER (1) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S
PROTECTION ET AL., COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO
Defendants. AMEND, (Doc. No. 1); AND
16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, (Doc. No. 4); AND
(3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S IFP MOTION, (Doc. No. 20 2.) 21 The Court reviews pro se Plaintiff William Joseph Neill’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when a plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. Nos. 1–2.) Under this mandatory screening, the Court finds Plaintiff’s Complaint does not state a plausible claim for relief. Thus, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s IFP motion, (Doc. No. 2), DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, (Doc. No. 4), and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s …