Neill

Neill v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20203:20-cv-01288California2,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM JOSEPH NEILL, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01288-AJB-MSB Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v.

U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER (1) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

PROTECTION ET AL., COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

Defendants. AMEND, (Doc. No. 1); AND

16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, (Doc. No. 4); AND

(3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S IFP MOTION, (Doc. No. 20 2.) 21 The Court reviews pro se Plaintiff William Joseph Neill’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when a plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. Nos. 1–2.) Under this mandatory screening, the Court finds Plaintiff’s Complaint does not state a plausible claim for relief. Thus, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s IFP motion, (Doc. No. 2), DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, (Doc. No. 4), and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.