Ortega

Williams v. Ortega

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20203:18-cv-00547California686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 18-cv-00547-LAB-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S

v. LETTER AND REQUEST FOR

SUBPOENA DOCUMENTS

O. ORTEGA, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 57] 14 Plaintiff Lance Williams is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, with a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 39). On July 17, 2020, Plaintiff filed a letter requesting the Court to stamp and certify a subpoena duces tecum to be served by the United States Marshal on a non-party. (ECF No. 57). Plaintiff’s proposed subpoena, directed to the non-party Richard J. Donovan Litigation Department for the attention of “II Connie,” seeks information regarding to all “D.D.P. employees working under Dr. Zudiker” between the dates of January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2019. Service of a subpoena duces tecum is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. A pro se plaintiff who is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.