Jacome

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER JACOME, Case No.: 3:18-cv-0010-GPC-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND ISSUING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE.

DIMITRIS VLAHAKIS, et. al,

[ECF No. 73] Defendants. 16 Before the Court is Defendants Ryan Smith, Kyle McGarvey, Mathew Seitz, James Parent, Habib Choufani, Joshua Linthicum, and Joseph Pirri’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Alexander Jacome’s Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (ECF No. 73.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the motion. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, on or before November 4, 2020, why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. I. Background Defendant’s motion challenges Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute his Complaint during the discovery process. As such, the Court first summarizes Plaintiff’s allegations and…