Rashaad

Rashaad v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20203:19-cv-01126-MMA-MDDCalifornia2,974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMETRIUS R., Case No.: 19cv1126-MMA-MDD

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION

AND CROSS MOTION FOR

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

of Social Security, [ECF NOS. 15, 20] Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Demetrius Rashaad (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”). (AR ).1 For the reasons expressed herein, the Court RECOMMENDS the case be REMANDED to the ALJ for further analysis.

26 1 “AR” refers to the Certified Administrative Record filed on October 28, 2019. (ECF No. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was born in December 1967. (AR 35). At the time the instant application was filed on July…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.