Sen

Sen v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20203:16-cv-01486California4,952 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 AYSE SEN, Case No.: 16cv1486-JAH (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. AMAZON.COM, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. AMAZON.COM, INC., No. 32) Defendant. 15 INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Amazon.com, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Amazon”) motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. No. 32. Plaintiff Ayse Sen’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint alleges: (1) trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C § 1114(1)(a); (2) unfair competition, false designation of origin, passing off, and false advertising in violation of 15 U.S.C §1125(a), and (3) tortious interference with business relations or an economic advantage. Id. The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s claims based on the third party “Nanners” review. See Doc. No. 74. Therefore, the Court will only address…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.