Acevedo

Acevedo v. The Loan Company of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20203:20-cv-01263California5,155 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 DIMAS ACEVEDO, Case No. 20-cv-1263-BAS-MSB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

v. [ECF No. 3] THE LOAN COMPANY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On July 7, 2020, Plaintiff Dimas Acevedo filed an Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, requesting the Court enjoin a scheduled foreclosure. (ECF No. 3.) Defendant The Loan Company of San Diego filed an opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 9) to which Plaintiff replied (“Reply,” ECF No. 13). The Court held a telephonic oral argument on July 29, 2020. The Court then ordered supplemental briefing on one issue and temporarily postponed the foreclosure until further order. (ECF No. 18.) Both parties filed briefs. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion and lifts the temporary postponement of the foreclosure. I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff is the owner of two parcels of land located at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.