Vashisht-Rota
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an Case No.: 20-CV-321 JLS (KSC) individual,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
Plaintiff, PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES,
15 a Utah limited liability company; CHRIS (ECF No. 48) HOWELL, an individual; and JUSTIN SPENCER, an individual, 17 Defendants.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Dr. Aparna Vashisht-Rota’s Motion [for] Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 48). Plaintiff failed to call chambers to obtain a hearing date prior to filing the Motion, as is required under Civil Local Rule 7.1(b). Although the Court would generally set a hearing date and briefing schedule, the Court determines that further briefing is not necessary. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), a plaintiff may amend her complaint once as a matter of course within specified time limits. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). “In all other…