Power Integrations, Inc. v. Silanna Semiconductor North America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20203:20-cv-00410California10,179 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-410-MMA (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

EDISON D. DE LARA, et al.,

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants. [Doc. No. 79] 16 17 18 In its Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Power Integrations, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) alleges four causes of action: (1) breach of contract; (2) trade secret misappropriation under 18 U.S.C. § 1836; (3) interference with contractual relations; and (4) unfair competition under the California Business and Professions Code. See Doc. No. 78 (“SAC”). Defendants Edison D. De Lara (“De Lara”), Charles Reyes Evangelista (“Evangelista”), Ian B. Barrameda (“Barrameda”), and Alex F. Mariano II (“Mariano”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiff’s four causes of action pursuant to 26 27 28 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Doc. No. 79. Plaintiff filed an opposition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.