Power Integrations, Inc. v. Silanna Semiconductor North America, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-410-MMA (DEB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND
EDISON D. DE LARA, et al.,
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants. [Doc. No. 79] 16 17 18 In its Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Power Integrations, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) alleges four causes of action: (1) breach of contract; (2) trade secret misappropriation under 18 U.S.C. § 1836; (3) interference with contractual relations; and (4) unfair competition under the California Business and Professions Code. See Doc. No. 78 (“SAC”). Defendants Edison D. De Lara (“De Lara”), Charles Reyes Evangelista (“Evangelista”), Ian B. Barrameda (“Barrameda”), and Alex F. Mariano II (“Mariano”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiff’s four causes of action pursuant to 26 27 28 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Doc. No. 79. Plaintiff filed an opposition to…