Schreiber
Inline Utilities, LLC v. Schreiber
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INLINE UTILITIES, LLC, Case No.: 20-CV-0670-CAB-WVG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS
DANIEL J. SCHREIBER, SCHREIBER
LIVING TRUST DTD 02/08/1995,
15 [Doc. No. 11] Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss claim one of Plaintiff’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim and for the Court to decline supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Upon consideration of the pleadings and the motion, the motion is granted. I. Allegations in the First Amended Complaint According to the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”), Innerline Engineering, Inc. (“Innerline”), which is not a party to this case, contracted with Pacific Gas & Electric (the “PG&E Contract”) “to provide certain utility line inspection services.” [Doc. No. 7 at ¶ 1.] Innerline had a profit participation note in favor of Inner Assets, LLC, another non- 28 party,…