Schreiber

Inline Utilities, LLC v. Schreiber

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20203:20-cv-00670California2,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INLINE UTILITIES, LLC, Case No.: 20-CV-0670-CAB-WVG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

DANIEL J. SCHREIBER, SCHREIBER

LIVING TRUST DTD 02/08/1995,

15 [Doc. No. 11] Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss claim one of Plaintiff’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim and for the Court to decline supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Upon consideration of the pleadings and the motion, the motion is granted. I. Allegations in the First Amended Complaint According to the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”), Innerline Engineering, Inc. (“Innerline”), which is not a party to this case, contracted with Pacific Gas & Electric (the “PG&E Contract”) “to provide certain utility line inspection services.” [Doc. No. 7 at ¶ 1.] Innerline had a profit participation note in favor of Inner Assets, LLC, another non- 28 party,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.