Manipoun

Manipoun v. Dibela

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20203:17-cv-02325California3,231 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MERIDA MANIPOUN a.k.a. ANOMA Case No.: 17-CV-2325-AJB-BGS

SENGVIXAY,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR RULE 11

SANCTIONS

LOU DIBELLA; CHRIS KELLY;

15 LINDA CARR; JAMES COX; SAN (Doc. No. 91) DIEGO EUROPEAN MOTORCARS, LTD. d/b/a ASTON MARTIN OF SAN 17 DIEGO; and DOES 1-20, Defendants. 19 Pending before this Court is a Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions filed by Defendants San Diego European Motorcars, Ltd. d/b/a Aston Martin of San Diego and James Cox (“Defendants”). (Doc. No. 91.) Oppositions were filed by Mr. VerStandig, (Doc. No. 102), Mr. Obagi, (Doc. No. 105), Mr. Vining, Ms. Colt, and Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 103). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions. / / / / / / / / / BACKGROUND On May 7, 2016, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.