Carreno

Carreno v. 360 Painting, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20203:19-cv-02239California1,948 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITIED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Deborah Carreno, Case No. 3:19 CV 02239 LAB BGS

Plaintiff,

vs. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM

360 Painting LLC., [Dkt. 21] Defendant 14 15 And Related Counter Claim 17 A pleading is only a statement of a party’s claims, designed to provide “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is available when a pleading “fail[s] to state a claim”—that is, the pleading isn’t a “statement of the claim showing . . . entitle[ment] to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); see, e.g., 5B Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 1356 (3d ed.) (“Only when [a pleading] fails to meet the [Rule 8(a)(2) . . . standard . . . is it subject to dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6).”) So motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) call on courts to answer only this: Is the challenged pleading a statement of a claim showing that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.