Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20203:18-cv-00361California304 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-cv-00361-JLS-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

DANIEL PARAMO, et al., [DKT. NO. 157] Defendants. 16 Before the Court is Petitioner Mychal Andra Reed’s “Motion for Counsel.” Dkt. No. 157. The Court denied each of Plaintiff’s past three motions for appointment of counsel for lack of exceptional circumstances, with the last order filed January 10, 2020. Dkt. Nos. 54, 87, 97 (motion for reconsideration of court order denying appointment of counsel), 103 (January 10, 2020 order denying reconsideration). On July 13, 2020, Plaintiff filed this (his fourth) request, claiming he is receiving “persistent ‘retaliation’ by Defendants” and does not have the resources or legal knowledge to litigate his claims without counsel. Dkt. No. 157 at 1–2. Plaintiff specifically requests the Court appoint Alex Coolman to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.